We have already talked about the advantages and disadvantages of drugs in another article that you also have compared to this other article on why people use drugs? can read. Economists looked at the impact that recreational marijuana laws passed in 18 states and the District of Columbia had on key indicators of the “gateway” narrative. The analysis is the first to “comprehensively examine the broader impact of state recreational marijuana (LR) laws on a wide range of outcomes related to hard drug use, including non-marijuana illicit use, drug-related arrests, property crimes, and violent arrests. Mortality due to drug-related overdoses, suicides and admissions to drug treatment. The strongest argument is that only the UN could formalize the legalization of drugs, a reason shared even by those who want an end to prohibition. At present, it is very difficult to achieve this if we take into account the fact that 160 countries should agree, some of which have veto power and are against it, such as the United States. Contrary to the argument of the sovereign freedom of the individual to do what he wants with his health. And to enjoy the right to use drugs, those who believe that ensuring the well-being of citizens is also the job of governments to ensure that their individual choice has an impact on society as a whole. Ultimately, it is the teetotallers who have to bear the economic burden of restoring the physical and mental health of the drug home” 9 Arguments against drug legalization In four different national databases, researchers find “inconsistent evidence” that recreational marijuana laws have strong drug-initiating effects. The study finds “unconvincing evidence” that the legalization of marijuana leads to a further increase in drug use, arrests for serious drug offenses, drug overdoses or admissions to drug treatment. Since minors would not have access to drugs that would become illegal for them, they would try to break the law by going to the black market. One of the immediate consequences of legalization would be increased consumption.
Although experiments with guinea pigs show that drug use increases or decreases in proportion to the ease or difficulty of maintaining it, we know that other factors influence people. Faced with those who advocate at least the legalization of so-called “soft drugs,” there are experts who say that it would be even more counterproductive to legalize some drugs and not others because the mafia would focus on spreading illegal drugs. Today we are going to talk about the arguments against the legalization of drugs and what they are based on to draw conclusions. We have already talked about the risk of drugs in another article: the risks of drug use. President Biden himself has long made this claim, declaring in 2010 that “I still believe [marijuana] is an entry drug.” It wasn`t until 2019, when he ran for president, that Biden began to withdraw that position. However, it still does not fully support the legalization of marijuana nationwide. And the “gateway” position continues to be held by many other politicians who cling to their opposition to a widespread legalization movement. For example, Republican Congressman Andy Harris recently called marijuana a “well-known entry drug into opioid addiction” while opposing legalization. Politicians campaigning to criminalize recreational marijuana use have long angered voters with terrible warnings that the substance acts as a “revolutionary drug.” They insist that although deaths directly caused by marijuana use are virtually non-existent, weed will eventually lead many users to more dangerous drugs. With regard to the regularization of the market by the state, as proposed by the anti-prohibition, those who consider legalization unnecessary argue that those who are addicted to drugs would thus be caught buying on the illegal market.
Where prices would certainly be lower, although their quality would also decrease. Therefore, the crime would not be stopped. Those who believe that the legalization of drugs would only exacerbate the problem are the majority in our society. And you need to be aware of the negativity of most substances. Not only in terms of disorders and addictions, but also because of what they produce in a person when they are abused. The argument for legalizing marijuana is essentially an argument for personal choice and individual freedom. To resist Americans` right to decide for themselves, politicians must resort to alarmism, no matter how many studies refute their false apocalyptic narratives. On the other hand, the most disadvantaged and vulnerable social groups would be those who would end up depending. And those who have fewer resources to overcome this addiction. Please enable JavaScript and reload the page to take advantage of our modern features. In the case of locally grown cannabis, it is not excluded that this harvest for self-consumption does not transcend and begin to feed their environment, which would again feed the black market. Unfounded, indeed.
But don`t expect critics to change their minds. However, a new study suggests that the idea that marijuana is an “entry drug” is little more than a political fiction. Proponents of non-legalization also believe that organized crime would transform its lucrative drug trafficking routes into other criminal acts. However, the perception of risk would decrease and it is possible that if a group of friends or even relatives consumed, the undecided would do the same. Given this, anti-prohibitionists argue that there would be a time when consumption would stabilize, as was the case with the repeal of prohibition in the United States. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, with the exception of material for which the copyright of a party other than FEE is reserved. Related Reading: Alcoholism, Treatment, Effects, Types. They say there is even “evidence that legalizing recreational marijuana reduces mortality associated with heroin and other opioids.” .